As per the new RBI guidelines, customers are no longer allowed to alter the Amount or the Payee Name while issuing a cheque. The cheques with such corrections will no longer be honoured effective 1st July, 2010.
Monday, June 14, 2010
As per the new RBI guidelines, customers are no longer allowed to alter the Amount or the Payee Name while issuing a cheque. The cheques with such corrections will no longer be honoured effective 1st July, 2010.
Sunday, March 22, 2009
I am setting out the web-sites giving a list of law colleges in India -
PS: While choosing a law college, just don't follow the rankings. Sometimes good colleges are left out or are ranked lower...
Monday, December 29, 2008
Project Manager is a Person who thinks nine women can deliver a baby in One month.
Developer is a Person who thinks it will take 18 months to deliver a Baby.
Onsite Coordinator is one who thinks single woman can deliver nine babies in one month.
Client is the one who doesn't know why he wants a baby.
Marketing Manager is a person who thinks he can deliver a baby even if no man and woman are available.
Resource Optimization Team thinks they don't need a man or woman; they'll produce a child with zero resources.
Documentation Team thinks they don't care whether the child is delivered, they'll just document 9 months.
Quality Auditor is the person who is never happy with a delivered baby.
Tester is a person who always tells that this is not the Right baby.
HR Manager is a person who thinks that...
a Donkey can deliver a Human Baby - if given 9 Months !!!
Wednesday, December 3, 2008
Over the last week, many of us have been inundated with emails encouraging us to “vote for nobody”, claiming, among other things, that this is a way of driving out electoral candidates. As our member, and Senior Advocate, Chander Uday Singh points out, this is a complete myth. Many thanks to Chander for this timely advice. A postscript has been contributed by Mr Parag Kabadi, of Doijode Associates. There is also a link to a fairly good article on Wikipedia, to the same effect. Please circulate and forward this widely.
“Vote for Nobody”: A Myth
by Chander Uday Singh
Senior Advocate, Bombay High Court
This chain mail (one version is at the foot of this message) has been doing the rounds for some time now, but is based on a complete misunderstanding of the statutory provisions.
Neither the Consitution of India nor the Representation of the People Act, 1950 contain any provision to suggest that failure or refusal to vote can have any bearing on the outcome of an election at which other people have duly voted for the candidate of their choice. The provision in question, “49-O”, is actually a mere Rule which has been enacted in order to deal with a peculiarity of the electronic voting system which India pioneered.
“The Conduct of Election Rules, 1961” have been framed under the Representation of the People Act, 1950, and make detailed provisions for everything from filing of nomination papers to casting of votes, counting of votes, and the like. Separate provisions are made for direct elections such as to Parliament and State Assemblies, and for indirect voting such as in electoral colleges. Part IV of the Rules covers “Voting in Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies”, while Part V covers “Counting of Votes in Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies”. Part IV has two Chapters, with Chapter I (Rules 28 to 48) applying to “Voting by Ballot”, and Chapter II (Rules 49-A to 49-X), which was added in 1992 to deal with the new phenomenon of electronic voting, applying to “Voting by Electronic Voting Machines”.
Rule 49-O, which is part of Chapter II, has been introduced in order to account for all electors who have attended and signed into the polling station. In the case of voting by ballot, the actual number of ballot papers issued are required to be tallied with the votes cast in order to avoid any malpractice, and this account includes ballot papers which have been properly marked, ballot papers which have been accidentally torn/defaced, ballot papers which are seized from electors who refuse or fail to put them into the ballot boxes, and so on. Since ballot papers are physically verifiable and can be counted (whether from the ballot boxes or from sealed envelopes containing defaced/torn/misused ballot papers), there was no need prior to 1992 to have any special Rule to obtain the signature of an elector who attended the polling process but refused or failed to cast her/his vote.
However, when voting is done by electronic voting machines, there is no physical manifestation of the vote. Hence, all accounting has to be done by verification of the registers which are signed by the electors before going behind the screen and punching a button on the voting machine. There being no such thing as a blank or defaced or torn ballot, it became necessary to provide that if an elector, after coming to the polling station and signing in, refuses or declines to cast her/his vote, then a remark has to be made in the register and the signature/thumb impression of the elector has to be obtained against such remark. This remark/entry is then relied upon while counting votes under Rule 66-A, which is a special Rule for counting of votes cast in electronic voting machines, since the machine only records the votes actually cast, and has no means of knowing how many people signed in but failed/refused to cast their votes.
Rule 66-A read with Form 17-C make it clear that the purpose of Rule 49-O is only to ensure that electors who fail to vote ater signing into the pollking station have done so of their own accord and not due to any force or coercion. Form 17-A is the form in which the polling booth register is to be maintained, which is signed by all electors when they enter the polling booth and are identified against the list of valid voters at that booth. Form 17-C records the final count of votes as per Rule 66-A, and this has to be signed by the election agents of all the candidates as it reflects the final result of the tally. Column 6 of Form 17-C requires that the number of electors who actually cast their votes as per the voting machine, be added to the number of those who declined/refused to vote, i.e. those in respect of whom a remark is entered against their names in the voting register (Form 17-A) under Rule 49-O, and that the total of these two figures should tally with the total who signed the voter’s register. In case of any discrepancy in this total, the polling agents have to explain the discrepancy in Form 17-C. This is nothing but an accounting procedure devised in order to ensure that there is neither any bogus voting, nor any force used to prevent valid electors from casting their votes.
Importantly, there is nothing whatsoever in the Act or Rules to suggest that if electors either individually or collectively decline to cast their votes and get this fact recorded under Rule 49-O, then this would have any effect whatsoever on the election. Elections are won (or lost) on the basis of votes cast in favour of different candidates, and not on abstentions. The Greek definition of “idiot” remains as valid as ever, and Rule 49-O has done nothing to elevate a person who refuses to vote out of that category.
Parag Kabadi adds:
Although Rule 49 O provides that an elector may refuse to vote after he has been identified and necessary entries made in the Register of Electors and the marked copy of the electoral roll, the secrecy of voting is not protected inasmuch as the polling officials and the polling agents in the polling station get to know about the decision of such a voter.
The Election Commission has therefore recommended that the law should be amended to provide that in the ballot paper and the particulars on the ballot unit, in the column relating to names of candidates, after the entry relating to the last candidate, there should be a column, “None of the above”, to enable a voter to reject all the candidates, if he chooses so.
Such a proposal was earlier made by the Election Commission in December, 2001 and reiterated in July, 2004 (vide letter dated 10.12.2001). Text of the recommendations is available here.
Interestingly, nothing is provided in the Election Commission’s recommendations, regarding re-election or invalidation of the current candidates. If such a consequence is really provided it will be great, until then, as Chander indicated, don’t be an “idiot”"!
See also: Wikipedia on Rule 49-O
Monday, December 1, 2008
RBI has rightly stated that levying such charges subsequent to the borrowing of loan, without disclosing the same to the borrower initially, is an unfair practice.
The relevant notification is set out below:
RBI / 2008-09 / 296
DBOD.No.Leg.BC. 86 /09.07.005/2008-09
November 25, 2008
All Scheduled Commercial Banks / All India Financial Institutions
Guidelines on Fair Practices Code for Lenders- Disclosing
all information relating to processing fees / charges
Please refer to our Circular DBOD.No.Leg.BC.65 /09.07.005/2006-07 dated March 6, 2007 wherein banks / FIs were advised that loan application forms in respect of all categories of loans irrespective of the amount of loan sought by the borrower should be comprehensive. It should include information about the fees/charges, if any, payable for processing, the amount of such fees refundable in the case of non acceptance of application, pre-payment options and any other matter which affects the interest of the borrower, so that a meaningful comparison with that of other banks can be made and informed decision can be taken by the borrower.
2. It has come to our notice that some banks levy in addition to a processing fee, certain charges which are not initially disclosed to the borrower. It may be mentioned that levying such charges subsequently without disclosing the same to the borrower is an unfair practice.
3. Banks / FIs are therefore advised to ensure that all information relating to charges /fees for processing are invariably disclosed in the loan application forms. Further, the banks must inform ‘all-in-cost’ to the customer to enable him to compare the rates charged with other sources of finance.
Chief General Manager-in-Charge
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
Reverse Mortgage Scheme, 2008
Ministry : Ministry of Finance
Department / Board : CBDT
Notification No : 93/2008
Date : 30.09.2008
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (xvi) of section 47 of the Income -tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby makes the following scheme, namely:
1. Short title, commencement and application -
(1) This scheme may be called the Reverse Mortgage Scheme, 2008.
(2) It shall be deemed to have come into force from the 15th day of April, 2008.
(3) Save as otherwise provided in the Scheme, it shall be applicable to all eligible persons.
2. Definitions - In this Scheme, unless the context otherwise requires,-
(a) "Act" means the Income -tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961);
(b) "approved lending institution" means -
(i) National Housing Bank established under section 3 of the National Housing Bank Act, 1987 (53 of 1987);
(ii) a scheduled bank included in the second schedule to the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934; or
(iii) a housing finance company registered with the National Housing Bank;
(c) "Board" means the Central Board of Direct Taxes constituted under the Central Boards of Revenue Act, 1963 (54 of 1963);
(d) "Capital asset" means a residential house property which is located in India;
(e) "eligible person" means
(i) any person, being an individual, who is of, or above, the age of sixty years; or
(ii) any married couple, if either of the husband or wife is of, or above, the age of sixty years;
(f) "Reverse Mortgage" means mortgage of a capital asset by an eligible person against a loan obtained by him from an approved lending institution;
(g) "reverse mortgagor" means the eligible person who has mortgaged the capital asset for the purpose of obtaining loan;
(h) "reverse mortgage transaction" means a transaction in which the loan may be disbursed to the reverse mortgagor but does not include transaction of sale, or disposal, of the property for settlement of the loan;
(i) All other words and expressions used herein, but not defined and defined in the Act, shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in the Act.
3. Application and processing for reverse mortgage transaction -
(1) Any eligible person may enter into a reverse mortgage transaction by applying in writing to the approved lending institution, if the capital asset, being mortgaged, is-
(i) owned by him; and
(ii) free from any encumbrances.
(2) The application under sub-rule, (1) shall be processed by the approved lending institution and for this purpose the institution may charge nominal amount as processing fees.
4. Sanction of reverse mortgage loan -
(1) The approved lending institution, before taking mortgage of capital asset and before disbursing any loan under reverse mortgage, shall-
(a) enter into a loan agreement in writing with the reverse mortgagor; and
(b) obtain and maintain the following particulars from the reverse mortgagor, namely:-
(i) Name and address of the owner of the capital asset;
(ii) Permanent Account Number of the owner of the capital asset;
(iii) Total area, including built up or covered area, of the capital asset;
(iv) Cost of acquisition and the year of acquisition of the capital asset;
(v) Cost of improvement and the year of improvement of the capital asset;
(vi) Name, address and Permanent Account Number of all the legal heirs and estate of the owner of the capital asset;
(vii) A copy of the registered will of the owner of the capital asset including any changes made therein during the currency of the term of the loan.
5. Disbursement of loan -
(1) The approved lending institution may disburse the loan to the
reverse mortgagor by any one or more of the following modes, namely:-
(i) periodic payments to be decided mutually between the approved lending institution and the reverse mortgagor;
(ii) lump-sum payment in one or more trenches, to the extent that the aggregate of the amount disbursed as lump sum payments does not exceed fifty per cent. of the total loan amount sanctioned.
6. Period of reverse mortgage loan -
The loan under reverse mortgage shall not be granted for a period exceeding twenty years from the date of signing the agreement by the reverse mortgagor and the approved lending institution.
7. Repayment of loan -
The reverse mortgagor, or his legal heirs or estate, shall be liable for repayment of the principal amount of loan along with the interest to the approved lending institution at the time of foreclosure of the loan agreement.
(Kamlesh C. Varshney)
Tuesday, November 4, 2008
Directory of firms operating in India
• A V Dave & Associates/M/s Dave registration services in Bhavnagar and Ahmedabad
• A.R.A. LAW in Bangalore and Mumbai
• A.Y.Chitale & Associates in New Delhi
• ALMT Legal in Mumbai and Bangalore
• ARSS Legal in New Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, and Bangalore
• AZB & Partners in Mumbai, New Delhi, and Bangalore
• Abhay Ahuja & Associates in Mumbai
• Aditya Sondhi Law Chambers in Bangalore
• Advani & Co in Mumbai
• Advani & Co. in Pune and New Delhi
• Akash Chittranshi & Associates in New Delhi
• Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A. Shroff & Co in Kolkata, Bangalore, Mumbai, New Delhi, Hyderabad, and Kolkata
• Amarjit & Associates in New Delhi
• Anand and Anand in New Delhi and Mumbai
• Apurva Vakil in Ahmedabad
• Archer & Angel in New Delhi
• Ashurst LLP in New Delhi
• Asia Trademark Ltd in New Delhi
• Associated Law Advisers in New Delhi
• Bajla, Iyer & Associates, Advocates in Mumbai
• Bhasin & Co in Mumbai and New Delhi
• Bhatt & Saldanha in Mumbai
• Bimal B. Bhaskar, Advocate, Corporate Lawyer in Hyderabad
• Chadha & Chadha in New Delhi
• Chandrakant M. Joshi in Mumbai
• Crawford Bayley & Co in Mumbai
• Crestlaw Partners in Bangalore
• D H Law Associates in Mumbai
• D P Ahuja & Co in Bangalore, New Delhi, Chennai, and Kolkata
• DM Harish & Co in Mumbai
• DSK Legal in New Delhi and Mumbai
• Daniel and Gladys in Chennai
• Daulet-Singh & Associates in New Delhi
• Dave & Girish & Co in Mumbai and Bangalore
• De Penning & De Penning in Chennai and Mumbai
• DeHeng Law Office in New Delhi
• Desai & Chinoy in Mumbai
• Desai & Diwanji in Bombay
• Dhir & Dhir Associates in New Delhi
• Dua Associates in New Delhi, Bangalore, and Mumbai
• Dubey & Partners in New Delhi
• Dutt Menon Dunmorr Sett in Bhubaneshwar, New Delhi, and Mumbai
• Economic Laws Practice in New Delhi and Mumbai
• Federal & Rashmikant in Mumbai
• Fox Mandal Little in Mumbai, Hyderabad, Chennai, Chandigarh, Bhubaneswar, Bangalore,Kolkata, Mumbai, New Delhi, Cochin, and New Delhi
• Gagrats in Mumbai and New Delhi
• Gandhi & Associates in Mumbai
• General Law Partners in Hyderabad
• Global Business Solutions in Chennai
• Gopakumar Nair Associates (GNA) in Mumbai
• H. K. Acharya & Company in Ahmedabad
• HSB Partners in Chennai
• Haresh Jagtiani & Associates in Mumbai
• Hariani & Co in Mumbai
• Hemant Sahai Associates - Advocates in Goa, Bangalore, Mumbai, and New Delhi
• Holla & Holla in Bangalore
• India Juris in New Delhi
• India Law Services in Bangalore and Mumbai
• IndoJuris Law Offices in New Delhi, Chennai, and Bangalore
• Indus G&D Law in New Delhi and Bangalore
• Iyer & Thomas Advocates in Chennai
• J Sagar Associates in New Delhi, Hyderabad, Mumbai, and Bangalore
• JM Sharma & Co in New Delhi
• Jafa & Javali in New Delhi
• Jehangir Gulabbhai & Bilimoria & Daruwalla in Mumbai
• Juris Corp in Mumbai
• K & S Partners in New Delhi and Bangalore
• K R Chawla & Co in Bangalore
• K. R. Chawla in New Delhi
• KSB Partners in Haryana
• Kachwaha & Partners in Chennai and New Delhi
• Kainth & Associates in Bangalore
• Kanga & Co in Mumbai
• Karanjawala and Company in New Delhi
• Kelley Drye & Warren LLP in Mumbai
• Kesar Dass B. & Associates in New Delhi
• Khaitan & Co. in Bangalore, Kolkata, New Delhi, and Mumbai
• King & Partridge Advocates in Madurai and Chennai
• King, Stubb & Kasiva in New Delhi, Chennai, and Bangalore
• Kochhar & Co in Bangalore, Chennai, Mumbai, and New Delhi
• Koura & Company in New Delhi
• Kris & Kolloth in New Delhi and Bangalore
• Krishna & Saurastri in Mumbai and Bangalore
• Krishnamurthy and Co in Bangalore
• L P Agarwalla & Co in Kolkata
• Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan in New Delhi
• Lall & Sethi Advocates in New Delhi, Bangalore, and Mumbai
• Lall Lahiri & Salhotra in Gurgaon
• Lex Nexus Advocates & Solicitors in Mumbai, Mumbai, and New Delhi
• Lexindia in New Delhi
• Lexygen in Bangalore
• Link Legal in New Delhi
• Luthra & Luthra in New Delhi, Bangalore, and Mumbai
• M Dhruva & Co in Mumbai
• M S Oberoi & Co in New Delhi
• MD&T Partners in Bangalore
• Majmudar & Co in Bangalore and Mumbai
• Mallar Law Consulting in Mumbai
• Manilal Kher Ambalal & Co in Mumbai
• Mars & Partners in New Delhi
• Mason & Associates in New Delhi
• Mehta & Mehta Associates in Gurgaon
• Mkono & Co in Bombay
• Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe in Bangalore and Mumbai
• NDLO South in Haryana
• Nanavati Associates in Ahmedabad
• Narasappa, Doraswamy & Raja in Bangalore
• Nishith Desai Associates in Bangalore and Mumbai
• O.P. Khaitan & Co. Solicitors and Advocates in New Delhi
• Obhan & Associates in New Delhi
• Office Of Parasaran in Chennai
• P & A Law Offices in Mumbai and New Delhi
• P H Parekh & Co in New Delhi
• PSA Legal Counsellors in New Delhi
• Paras Kuhad & Associates in Jaipur, Jodhpur, Mumbai, Ahmedabad, New Delhi, Kolkata,Pune, and Chennai
• Parker & Parker Company in Ahmedabad
• Pavan Duggal Associates Advocates in New Delhi
• Poovayya & Co in Bangalore and New Delhi
• Preconcept in Noida
• Premnath Rai Associates in New Delhi
• Puthran & Associates in Chennai
• R Ginodia & Co in Kolkata
• R Murari, Advocate in Chennai
• R. Subrahmanyam & Associates in Chennai
• Radhakrishnan & Company in Cochin
• Rajani Associates, Advocates & Solicitors in Mumbai
• Rajinder Narain & Co in Mumbai and New Delhi
• Ranjan & Narula Associates in Gurgaon
• Remfry & Sagar in Gurgaon
• S Jalan & Company in Kolkata and New Delhi
• S Majumdar & Co in Kolkata and Mumbai
• S&R Associates in New Delhi
• S. Venkateshwaran in Mumbai
• S.K. Tulsiyan & Co in Kolkata and Mumbai
• S.N. Gupta & Co in New Delhi and Mumbai
• SKS Law Associates in Haryana and New Delhi
• Saikrishna & Associates in Noida
• Sandersons & Morgans in Kolkata
• Seth Dua & Associates in Bangalore and New Delhi
• Sewak and Associates in New Delhi
• Sharma & Sharma in New Delhi
• Sibal and Eradi in New Delhi
• Singh & Associates in New Delhi
• Singhania & Co in Mumbai, Hyderabad, Chennai, Kolkata, Bangalore, New Delhi, and Chandigarh
• Singhania & Partners in Mumbai, Mumbai, Hyderabad, New Delhi, and Bangalore
• Singhi & Co in Ahmedabad
• Sinha & Company, Advocates in Kolkata
• Solomon & Co. in Mumbai
• Suman Khaitan & Co in New Delhi
• Sunil Kansal & Associates in Mumbai and New Delhi
• Surana & Surana International Attorneys in Chennai
• Swarup & Company in New Delhi
• Talwar Thakore & Associates in Mumbai
• Thakker & Thakker in Bangalore, New Delhi, Mumbai, and Hyderabad
• Thiru & Thiru in Hyderabad, Chennai, and Bangalore
• Thomas & Krishnaswami Law Associates in Chennai
• Titus & Co in New Delhi
• Trilegal in Andhra Pradesh, Mumbai, Bangalore, and New Delhi
• Tuli & Co in Mumbai and New Delhi
• Tyabji Dayabhai in Mumbai
• Udwadia & Udeshi in Bangalore and Mumbai
• V J Mathew & Co in Cochin, Coimbatore, Bangalore, New Delhi, Tuticorin, and Chennai
• VNS Legal in Chennai
• Vaish Associates in New Delhi and Mumbai
• Victor Moses & Co in Kolkata
• Vigil Juris in Mumbai
• Viswanathan & Co in New Delhi
• W.S. Kane and Co/Law & Prudence in Mumbai
• Wadia Ghandy & Co in Mumbai, Pune, Ahmedabad, Bangalore and New Delhi
• White & Case LLP Liaison Office in Mumbai
Do a Ctrl + F to find the law firm you are looking for.
This is not a complete list and there are several firms who have offices at places other than those mentioned above.